home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Illusion - Is Seeing Really Believing?
/
Illusion - Is Seeing Really Believing (1998)(Marshall Media)[Mac-PC].iso
/
pc
/
illusion
/
hub_fie.cxt
/
00083_Field_frep13.txt
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1996-12-30
|
2KB
|
59 lines
This was the situation in
1958, when Torsten Wiesel and I
made one of our first
technically successful
recordings from the cortex of a
cat. The position of
microelectrode tip, relative to
the cortex, was unusually
stable, so much so that we were
able to listen in on one cell for
a period of about nine hours. We
tried everything short of
standing on our heads to get it
to fire. (It did fire
spontaneously from time to
time, as most cortical cells do,
but we had a hard time
convincing ourselves that our
stimuli had caused any of that
activity.) After some hours we
began to have a vague feeling
that shining light in one
particular part of the retina was
evoking some response, so we
tried concentrating our efforts
there. To stimulate, we were
using mostly white circular
spots and black spots. For black
spots, we would take a 1-by-2-
inch glass microscope slide,
onto which we had glued an
opaque black dot, and shove it
into a slot in the optical
instrument Samuel Talbot had
designed to project images on
the retina. For white spots, we
used a slide of the same size
made of brass with a small hole
drilled through it. (Research
was cheaper in those days.)
After about five hours of
struggle, we suddenly had the
impression that the glass with
the dot was occasionally
producing a response, but the
response seemed to have little
to do with the dot. Eventually
we caught on: it was the sharp
but faint shadow cast by the
edge of the glass as we slid it
into the slot that was doing the
trick. We soon convinced
ourselves that the edge worked
only when its shadow was swept
across one small part of the
retina and that the sweeping
had to be done with the edge in
one particular orientation.